Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]David, A good solution would be both. 35mm just does not get the resolution needed for large prints from a flatbed scanner. Within limits mostly having to do with dynamic range a good flatbed works just fine for medium format or large format. So, for 35mm look particularly at the Minolta 5400 version II at around $500 and the Nikon 5000 at around $1100. The difference in price has to do with the ability to use bulk scanning devices and some build quality. For medium format the consensus for reasonable dollars would be one of the Epson, I believe but don't quote me the current model is the 4990. So, for a budget of $1000-$1600 you can have both. Of course the Nikon 8000/9000 is in that price range so maybe one box on the desk will work better for you. :) Don don.dory@gmail.com On 10/8/05, David Cochran <cochranpr@mac.com> wrote: > > > Hi to all. I am in the dark when it comes to scanners for negatives or > chrome. > > Which is better, flatbed or dedicated negative scanners? > > thanks in advance. > > > David > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >