Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]made the mistake of scanning some TCN today. Gadzooks! There is so much more dynamic range in those negs! Digital feels like slide film a few more stops. Think I read the DMR gets about 6 stops coverage. Can't just expose for the shadows anymore. Eric On 9/11/05, Eric Korenman <faneuil@gmail.com> wrote: > > The BW images seem to a glowing look to them - not sure if that is a plus > or a minus. Just a look. > They feel more IR like to me, especially around the boy's blond hair. > Eric > > On 9/11/05, Don Dory <don.dory@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Eric, > > You have some really great images of this child here. Don't mind the > > "noise" at higher ISO's, it is only in comparision to the Canon's that > > it is even out of pattern. > > > > I do have to say that the image with the moire could cause a fashion > > statement. > > > > Don > > don.dory@gmail.com > > > > On 9/11/05, Eric Korenman < faneuil@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Some more child portrait work. I am used to the look of scanend TCN > > film. > > > Of course, the DMR has different BW look. Converions were done in PS > > with > > > Fred Miranda's BW plugin. > > > Is it it me or do the BW images have a certian IR quality to them? > > > You may see a bit more noise in the indoor shots - I was trying out > > ISO 800. > > > All shot with 50mm summicron. > > > http://www.faneuil.net/DMR/c3.jpg > > > http://www.faneuil.net/DMR/c4.jpg > > > http://www.faneuil.net/DMR/c5.jpg > > > http://www.faneuil.net/DMR/c6.jpg > > > http://www.faneuil.net/DMR/c7.jpg > > > Eric > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Leica Users Group. > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > >