Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bill, I had both the 35/3.5 Summaron and the 35/2 Canon. I now just have the Canon, which is in every way a better lens, IMHO. Mark On 9/7/05, Bill Smith <wrs111445@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Is the 35/3.5 Summaron in LTM equal to the 35/2 Canon LTM? If so, what > year/ series is best to buy? > > Bill > > Jeff Sumner <jdos2@mindspring.com> wrote: > You need a J-12 to compare 'em all against. It's f/2.8... > >> I forgot... I have a 35/3.5 Summaron in LTM as well.... > >> > >> That is 4. Is that OK? > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > --------------------------------- > Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >