Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] leica branded lenses
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Sun Aug 28 11:56:55 2005
References: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNGEBDCKAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <002401c5abf2$83cc3240$1ae76c18@ted> <6.2.3.4.2.20050828135321.01ea4820@mail.rhtc.net> <46FE458A-D2BA-457A-8035-46013F9F8B8C@earthlink.net> <6.2.3.4.2.20050828141517.01ee7830@mail.rhtc.net>

I'm disappointed in the Canon 50/f1.4 and hope to replace it with a
Leica R prime.

Adam

On 8/28/05, Tina Manley <images@infoave.net> wrote:
> At 02:12 PM 8/28/2005, you wrote:
> 
> >Tina, have you shot the Canon 1.4/35, 2/35 or 1.4/50?
> >
> >Feli
> Feli -
> 
> I have the 50/1.4.  It's not a bad lens, but not in the same class
> with the 24/1.4 and the 85/1.2.  Those two are L lenses and are much
> heavier and have aspherical and UD lens elements and what they
> describe as a "circular diaphragm for better background blur" -
> whatever it is it works.  I don't have a Canon 35., but the 24 is
> actually a 31 with the 1.3 multiplier.
> 
> Tina
> 
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] leica branded lenses)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] leica branded lenses)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] leica branded lenses)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] leica branded lenses)