Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think you're right, Steve. Erwin, who can become rhapsodic about things Leica, was luke-warm. The executive summary might be "mediocre idea, moderately-well executed". Or, more to the point: too little, too late. Now some of that Leica glass with auto-diaphram for Canon (or Nikon) and they might find a premium market. It's already good using stop-down metering but I admit I'd like the auto-diaphram. Adam On 8/27/05, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote: > On Aug 27, 2005, at 10:38 AM, David Young wrote: > > An interesting and thoughtful take on the subject.... > > > > http://www.imx.nl/photosite/leica/digital/DMR/ddmr.html > > > yes David, interesting and thoughtful... but certainly not in strong > support of the DMR, and as I read it ....the conclusions and their > import for leica is devastating, more so considering the source. > > This helps drive home more than a single nail into the Leica coffin. > > > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >