Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Minolta 5400 Scanner vs 20d
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Wed Aug 10 09:44:36 2005
References: <DB8AA994F7DCAA478C487B62AA1C816A07E9430F@gsnmp02es.firmwide.corp.gs.com>

did u just shoot a slide via a slide copier on the 20d

On 8/10/05, Francis, Michael <michael.francis@gs.com> wrote:
> I mentioned that I was having some success with using my 20d to scan
> transparencies. The example is not from my M6, but I have others that are -
> the first image is a RAW conversion, sharpened in CS2, Second a resized and
> sharpened (not much difference) the third is from the 5400, note what looks
> like dirt (this is at 5400 dpi with ICE etc) The final image is the 20d 
> full
> frame. The 5400 takes 6mins, 20d 1.3secs @ f16 - for transparencies the 20d
> looks good enough and it is much more fun to spend time taking pictures 
> than
> scanning them.
> 
>  http://www.francis-web.com/Photography/Scanner/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


-- 
  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad


In reply to: Message from michael.francis at gs.com (Francis, Michael) ([Leica] OT: Minolta 5400 Scanner vs 20d)