Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard, Because sharpness is normally considered a desireable attribute in a photographic image. This is, after all, why we love Leica lenses. In some situations an unsharp picture is acceptable because of its strong visual content or the uniqueness of the situation--for example, Ted's picture of Pierre Trudeau sliding down a banister. In some other cases, unsharpness in the form of motion blur may be good if it adds a feeling of movement, making the image more dynamic. But in most cases--and the picture you posted falls in that category--a sharp image is better than an unsharp one. Nathan Nathan Wajsman Almere, Netherlands http://www.nathanfoto.com http://www.fotosevilla.com Print sales: http://www.photodeluge.com Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: Richard <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> Datum: woensdag, augustus 3, 2005 1:07 pm Onderwerp: [Leica] If Kyle can post dog pic... > But why does it have to look so sharp? > > http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/LJPics/crop0019web.jpg > > > // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, > please > use richard at imagecraft.com) > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >