Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!
From: firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin)
Date: Tue Jul 26 16:07:10 2005
References: <42E1A9B1.2040500@hemenway.com> <c26ed9441833d70bb618642616351de9@ncable.net.au> <42E1CF2C.9040508@planet.nl> <fe9cdb2c8d3c2567b13074b875800f90@ncable.net.au> <9b678e050726015474baa93f@mail.gmail.com>

Yes, I was surprised to find it in 120, but thought like you: now I need a 
red filter for the Bessa ii ;-) 

Don Dory writes: 

> A good IR film in 120?  Hmmmm, I haven't used the Texas Leica in quite
> a few months, but a 6X9 IR image could be stunning. 
> 
> Unique photo needs some more money I hear. 
> 
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
Alastair Firkin
www.afirkin.com
www.familyofman2.com 

In reply to: Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)