Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Tue Jul 26 01:55:00 2005
References: <42E1A9B1.2040500@hemenway.com> <c26ed9441833d70bb618642616351de9@ncable.net.au> <42E1CF2C.9040508@planet.nl> <fe9cdb2c8d3c2567b13074b875800f90@ncable.net.au>
 
A good IR film in 120?  Hmmmm, I haven't used the Texas Leica in quite
a few months, but a 6X9 IR image could be stunning.

Unique photo needs some more money I hear.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com

On 7/26/05, Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au> wrote:
> Yes, the Maco 820 in 35 and 120: now I just need the time to try it ;-)
> 
>
Replies: Reply from firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin) ([Leica] Re: InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
 In reply to: Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)