Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Luis, As you know, you can always take away fine details from an image when printing but it is very hard to put them in when you don't have them. My vote would be the new AA lens unless the previous version turns up very inexpensively at which point I wouldn't use it below 5.6 for critical work. Don don.dory@gmail.com On 7/24/05, Luis Ripoll <luisripoll@telefonica.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > Some time ago I've sold my Summicron 2/90 R, I found it was a great lens, > now I have a Tele-Elmarit 2,8/90 and for fine work I use the Summilux > 1,4/75mm. > > In my opinion the TE 2,8/90 give overall good quality, but not "the > transparence" and fine details of 2/90 R, I don't know if it pays to trade > it for a Cron 2/90 M or the AA 2/90, some people said me about this one > that > it was to much sharp, what I've appreciated on the pictures I've see on > internet is excellent detail and textuires in B&W. > > Some opinions comparing these lenses?, thanks in advance > > Saludos desde Barcelona > Luis > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >