Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] My PAW of week 27
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Wed Jul 13 15:58:59 2005

Hi Didier,

I suspect it's Jalbum that's causing it: it seems to enlarge any grain or
noise, too. So I put it on without this annoying pixelisation:

http://users.telenet.be/philippe.orlent/F1000020.jpg

---

> From: Didier Ludwig <rangefinder@screengang.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:21:59 +0200
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] My PAW of week 27
> 
> 
>> Unfortunately, a lot of detail and tone is lost because of the downsizing.
> 
> Philippe
> http://users.telenet.be/philippe.orlent/PAW2005/slides/Wk27.jpg
> Seems to be a downsizing problem. The picture looks very pixely to me. The
> black front shock absorber (of the bike in the middle) for instance, looks
> like a "pixel stairway". How did you downsize it? Is it the gallery tool
> that does it - because many of them make very cheap downsizing without
> bicubic recalculating. A Photoshop downsize with decent unsharp masking
> looks different, IMO. Just my 2 pesos...
> Didier
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] My PAW of week 27)
In reply to: Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] My PAW of week 27)