Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Don, I never tried the 21/3,4, I've always read this is a very great lens, for colectionists too. Thanks for your opinion Saludos desde Barcelona Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]En nombre de Don Dory Enviado el: domingo, 10 de julio de 2005 4:16 Para: Leica Users Group Asunto: Re: [Leica] Opinions about diffeent Leica 21mm Luis, I have the 21 F3.4 SA for the M and the 21 SA F4 for the R. The M version does have more vignetting but is sharper, no traditional distortion and a more even transition at the edges. As I shoot in B&W most of the time, I don't really have an appreciation for color differences. >From tests of the 19 and the 21 ASPH the newest glass will have more distortion but have much less loss of sharpness into the corners at the expense of smoothness that the less sharp predecessors had. Don don.dory@gmail.com On 7/9/05, Luis Ripoll <luisripoll@telefonica.net> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Some time ago I've sold my Super-Angulon R 4/21mm ("Wetzlar"), and bought > the Elmarit-M 2,8/21mm, in my opinion I appreciate these differences: > > The 21R rendered more warm tones than the M, I find this more cool. > Deformation of the perspective was more noticeable on the 21R, than on the > 21M. > Some tendence to vigneting is more appreciate on the M than on the R. > > Any opinions or experiences? > > Saludos desde Barcelona > Luis > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information