Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Optically, it is the same as the Sonnar. Mechanically, there is considerable difference. The prewar Zeiss Sonnars are brass and chrome, and are a delight to handle. Wartime Sonnars have the glass in aluminum mounts, which are considerably inferior to the earlier lenses in build. Nevertheless, a good sample can still be satisfying. The Jupiters really don't have the quality control of the Zeiss lenses. A good sample can be an incredible bargain -- the only problem is that you may have to go through several to get a good example. This is no big deal if you are patient -- you can buy and sell them on eBay easily. Mark On 6/16/05, Didier Ludwig <rangefinder@screengang.com> wrote: > Same formula as for the Sonnar 1.5/50 > > > >Bonsoir encore, > > I just purchased a Jupiter 50mm 1.5 lens and I am pleased with the > > results considering it s very modest price. Can someone on the list > > explain what lens was this inspiration for the 50mm 1.5 Jupiter lens? > > Best, > > Robert (Un chevalier sans blason) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >