Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi all Didier has asked me to post some trials between Lux & Cron 35 at F2, I've don't had the time, but I remembered this interesting test http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=455219, posted by Howard. IMHO it is easy appreciate: 1.- Summilux 35 ASPH is the best. 2.-Summicron 40 at F2 is better than Nokton. 3.- Nokton is better than Summilux Pre-Asph The conclusion could be very easy: Don't pay for a Pre-Asph Lux 35 mm, if you need 1,4 buy a Nokton, or a ASPH Lux, if you don't need 1,4 buy a Summicron. Except I still have a remaining self-question: IMO we can't judge a lens only for his performances at extreme conditions, and I ask me and to the other LUG friends, what about mid-tones?, grey tones? Middle contrast?, on these aspects I usually prefer Leica, but I don't have experience with Nokton. I'll appreciate your comments Saludos desde Barcelona Luis