Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Sat Jun 4 09:01:11 2005
References: <6.1.2.0.2.20050603182251.052b89b0@mail.comporium.net> <009901c5688d$e48a1820$129477d9@siscad.com> <4dccee3d05060315591fdcce03@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.2.0.2.20050603203439.05371e10@mail.comporium.net> <4dccee3d050603174112b816da@mail.gmail.com> <004d01c568ab$44817bc0$1ae76c18@ted>

Couldn't agree with you more on this. But I would of liked to see the  
DMR stacked up against a professional camera. Comparing it to the 20D  
just doesn't inspire much confidence with me.

Slobodan Dimitrov
Studio G-8, AGCC
http://sdimitrovphoto.com



On Jun 3, 2005, at 7:15 PM, Ted Grant wrote:

> David Mason offered:
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots
>
>
>
>> Well, it gives what data it can - but it certainly isn't telling us
>> the lens type, and aperture - just as I thought. So it would be
>> incomplete at best from the canon.<<<<<<<,,
>>
>
> Guys and gals I know I'm about to ask a completely inane stupid  
> question and undoubtedly there will be a million answers back why  
> one needs it. This recorded information.
>
> But here goes:
>
> I can't for the life of me understand what the heck you'd ever need  
> to know what lens, aperture and other miscellaneous information not  
> being read camera to camera?
>
> Isn't the whole action of taking pictures about the final  
> photograph and how well you shot it? Surely these other details  
> can't have much meaning for anything of logic in how good the end  
> product is going to be? Or was.
>
> I know people want to know what lens, aperture etc were used right  
> here on the list, but the question is some times asked when it's a  
> mere happy snap of no meaning.
>
> Now if there's a specific effect, say blurred action of runners in  
> a race and there's a beautiful effect of speed, then yes knowing  
> what the shutter speed was can be helpful, if the asking person is  
> going to try this effect. I have no problem with this because  
> that's how we learn.
>
> But having it recorded with the shot is like.... "Who cares? I'd be  
> far more interested in knowing it was a damn fine photograph than  
> "what lens was recorded."
>
> OK now all together, thrash me! ;-)
>
> ted
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
In reply to: Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
Message from pwerner at bluewin.ch (Peter Werner) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
Message from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
Message from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)