Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Lord of the Rings
From: firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin)
Date: Mon May 2 18:59:53 2005
References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050502150214.04ace0f0@mail.screengang.com> <050220051246.29089.4276211800043730000071A1220699849902019B020E9B9CD2020106@comcast.net> <6.2.1.2.2.20050502150214.04ace0f0@mail.screengang.com> <3.0.2.32.20050502192343.02191f48@pop.infionline.net>

I agree, but don't tell the New Zealanders: they are becoming a bit swollen 
above the shoulders anyway ;-) I missed Tom Bombadil: This is a tale of life 
and Tom was a "learning" distraction. Peripheral I know, but when you have a 
movie in three parts, an extra few minutes would have been fun: perhaps only 
on the DVD. 

Marc James Small writes: 

> I was rather distressed to note that several of you seem to have found the
> film version of the Lord of Rings unsatsfactory.  I found the trilogy
> reflected well most of the books though it comprehensively misses the
> subtle nature of Saruman's degradation into evil.  Other than that, the
> films work rather well. 
> 
> (I can always nitpick:  the presentation of Elrond is far too harsh and
> there is no real stress on his import within the forces of good, as the
> surviving son of Earendil and the brother of Elros, the founder of the
> royal line which Aragorn represents.  Thus, Elrond's disapproval of Aragorn
> in the films is a bit of a problem, but, then, Elrond is a
> behind-the-scenes player in the books so this mischaracterization is less
> troubling than the failure to properly portray Saruman.) 
> 
> Christopher Tolkien was extremely careful to ensure that the movies held
> close to the books in their plot and this was accomplished.  Do the movies
> represent MY views of the trilogy?  No, but they come close. 
> 
> And understand that I am a Tolkien freak of the first water:  my copy of
> the FELLOWSHIP, bought new, is a first-edition Ballantine printing and I
> bought the Ace editions of the next two books as Ballantine delayed in
> releasing theirs.  (Yes, yes, the copy I read now is a much later edition
> and incorporates all of the later emendations.)  I appreciate the
> conscientious effort to produce a series of movies being true to the
> author's vision, something which I feel is lacking in the HITCHHIKER'S 
> GUIDE. 
> 
> Marc
> msmall@aya.yale.edu 
> Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir! 
> 
> NEW FAX NUMBER:  +540-343-8505 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
 


Alastair Firkin
www.afirkin.com
www.familyofman2.com 

In reply to: Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] RE: digital/film/guitar debate)
Message from jon.stanton at comcast.net (jon.stanton@comcast.net) ([Leica] RE: digital/film/guitar debate)
Message from msmall at aya.yale.edu (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Lord of the Rings)