Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Let's Just Say That Leica Survives and....
From: firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin)
Date: Wed Apr 20 21:05:29 2005
References: <BE8C5D5D.13AD3%mark@rabinergroup.com> <42671ED2.5000304@planet.nl>
 
Nathan Wajsman writes: 


> Incidentally, even though I am a low-volume amateur compared to some of 
> the pros here, since switching to digital in August of last year, I have 
> saved more in film processing costs alone (not including the film itself) 
> than I paid for my Canon 20D.

And here's the rub, as we go forward the cost of film and processing will 
get greater, the choice lessened and the ----------- I have just come home 
from Vietnam and I loved using my M's. Loved it BUT, boy I could have used a 
longer focal length and when I processed over 100 images in water instead of 
HC110, the negs were a tad thin. Too late now to go back :-( 

Cheers 


Alastair Firkin
www.afirkin.com
www.familyofman2.com
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Let's Just Say That Leica Survives and....)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Let's Just Say That Leica Survives and....)