Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Tri-elmar
From: leirex at sbcglobal.net (David Lee)
Date: Fri Apr 15 09:02:52 2005
 
Is the new version any better than the original first version?  My 
understanding is both are the same in optics with the second version 
mechanically better designed.
 
Regards,
David

MIKIRO <miki@arbos.net> wrote:
Laurence,

In my experience, it was *slightly* less sharp than and more 
flare-prone, particularly at 50mm, than lenses with single focal 
lengths. Within these limits, it is an excellent lens.

MIKIRO

Laurence John wrote:
> Anyone got any feelings on the tri-elmar 28:35:50. I'm interested in 
> getting one.

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Tri-elmar)