Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] For B.D.
From: masonster at gmail.com (David Mason)
Date: Sun Apr 10 11:43:38 2005
References: <0927d7f4cdbd46f627c8688ab3d4169f@earthlink.net> <000301c53df4$247fb170$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4>

I'm just curious - have you actually tried that "lemon of a sensor
size" yourself?

On Apr 10, 2005 1:38 PM, Don Dory <dorysrus@mindspring.com> wrote:
> Feli,
> Olympus is trying to turn the lemon of a sensor size into lemonade by
> creating fast glass so that 800ISO at F2 is the same as 1600 as F2.8.
> With the emphasis on limited DOF in the fashion world I give them a fair
> chance of pulling it off.  Naw, the soccer mom shooting soccer or
> football will not be able to keep enough in focus at F2, and there are
> some really good lenses from independent manufacturers that are 2.8,
> quite good, quite cheap, and in the other guys mounts.
> 
> Again, I think Olympus is in a niche market with the 4/3 system.  A very
> good system that only a few people will appreciate. :(
> 
> Don
> dorysrus@mindspring.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf
> Of Feli
> Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:40 AM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] For B.D.
> 
> On Apr 10, 2005, at 5:07 AM, B. D. Colen wrote:
> 
> > Boy, there's a shocker!:-) There's only one problem with all of it,
> and
> > I say this as an Olympus whore -
> Shocking, isn't it? ;-)
> 
> >  thus far, the smaller sensor does seem
> > to translate into more noise at higher isos. It may well be that this
> > can be overcome, but there seems little question that at this point,
> > the
> > Canon DSLR's provide the lowest noise levels.
> 
> And that right there is my problem with the 4/3 system. I simply don't
> think
> they will be able to get the noise levels down, given the size of the
> chip,
> especially above 800asa. Both Nikon and Canon are struggling to keep
> things clean with the slightly bigger APS size. It a shame because it
> looks
> like a very nice system They  recently announced a 14-35mm (35mm
> equiv: 28-70mm) f2.0 and 35-100mm (35mm equiv: 70-200mm) f2.0.
> No one else is making fast glass like that.
> 
> feli
> ________________________________________________________
> feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4
> www.elanphotos.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
>

Replies: Reply from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] For B.D.)
In reply to: Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] For B.D.)
Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] For B.D.)