Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Apr 10, 2005, at 5:07 AM, B. D. Colen wrote: > Boy, there's a shocker!:-) There's only one problem with all of it, and > I say this as an Olympus whore - Shocking, isn't it? ;-) > thus far, the smaller sensor does seem > to translate into more noise at higher isos. It may well be that this > can be overcome, but there seems little question that at this point, > the > Canon DSLR's provide the lowest noise levels. And that right there is my problem with the 4/3 system. I simply don't think they will be able to get the noise levels down, given the size of the chip, especially above 800asa. Both Nikon and Canon are struggling to keep things clean with the slightly bigger APS size. It a shame because it looks like a very nice system They recently announced a 14-35mm (35mm equiv: 28-70mm) f2.0 and 35-100mm (35mm equiv: 70-200mm) f2.0. No one else is making fast glass like that. feli ________________________________________________________ feli2@earthlink.net 2 + 2 = 4 www.elanphotos.com