Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M3 purchase
From: firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Sat Apr 9 00:08:25 2005
References: <012e01c53b13$3f91e2f0$aa00a8c0@ic7max3> <425495A1.9020207@arbos.net> <00d301c53bd0$374e1e70$aa00a8c0@ic7max3> <42563287.8060101@arbos.net>
 
This page mentions the veiling glare in contre-jour  shots, 
particularly at 50mm. I have not been happy with this, and thought I 
might have a dud. So is it true of all TE's
On 08/04/2005, at 5:28 PM, MIKIRO wrote:

> You may want to have a look at my 0.02 comments at
>
> http://arbos.net/degustation.html
>
> I think I am right in saying modern ASPH Leica glass is superior to
> Zeiss glass, which is relatively old and comparable to Leica glass from
> the same era. I am very much interested to see how the new non-ASPH
> Zeiss will rival ASPH Leica but agree to an opinion that they lack big
> innovations. They probably give comparable image quality with different
> bouquets at somewhat lower prices. We will see.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mikiro

Alastair
In reply to: Message from creativevisions at verizon.net (Michael J Herring) ([Leica] M3 purchase)
Message from miki at arbos.net (MIKIRO) ([Leica] M3 purchase)
Message from creativevisions at verizon.net (Michael J Herring) ([Leica] M3 purchase)
Message from miki at arbos.net (MIKIRO) ([Leica] M3 purchase)