Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Is B.D. all wet again?
From: s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal)
Date: Mon Apr 4 23:00:02 2005
References: <000301c5396d$a4378e50$6401a8c0@bigguy> <4dccee3d05040416371cfce0a2@mail.gmail.com>

that explains it really love brussels sprouts.easy to spoil though by 
overcooking.Maybe one of our Belgian aqainteses has a good receipe to share?
simon jessurun
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Mason" <masonster@gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 1:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Is B.D. all wet again?


> Hi Walt,
>
> I was the one who started the whole thing so I feel like I should
> respond. It is simple, I just don't get much of a charge out of his
> work. I am well aware of his impact on the art world and the
> technologies of photography, et al. I am also sure that had I not been
> only a couple months old when you were hanging that show in 1969 I
> might appreciate that impact even more.
>
> All that notwithstanding, my reaction to his work is simply one of
> indifference. I see his work (either on every other calendar in the
> bookstore or in a museum) and it simply does nothing more for me than
> make me think "wow halfdome sure is beautiful". I won't apologize for
> it, its called personal taste - it makes no statement about the man
> himself. While I can look at landscape photography over and over, and
> I love taking it for my photo albums, I would buy 100 different Gene
> Smith clones' work before Ansel clones.
>
> I also think that brussel sprouts are one of the most vile vegetables
> on this planet.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2005 7:25 PM, Walt Johnson <walt@waltjohnson.com> wrote:
>> Can't help it B.D., been dwelling  on a comment you made a while back. 
>> Was
>> gonna let it slide (sometimes it best to keep trap shut) but must 
>> respond.
>>
>> You mentioned how boring  the Ansel Adams genre was. I railed. I chomped 
>> at
>> the bit. I had steam coming out my ears. I kept my mouth shut.
>>
>> Sorry, but it's of no avail. Ansel was a man who set trends, not followed
>> them. Sure, there are lots of look -alikes out there today. 'I'm sure we
>> could uncover a lot of Gene Smith clones too. Hey, every time I turn 
>> around
>> there are folks emulating Robert Frank, William Klein and Mary Ellen 
>> Mark.
>>
>> One thing is certain though, Ansel was an original. Sure, some of his
>> writing was a bit pedantic but he was an original. Artist, 
>> environmentalist,
>> and humanitarian.
>>
>> I help to  hang one of his shows in 1969 and was very sad not to be able 
>> to
>> have $75 dollars to buy a signed "Moonrise over Hernandez".  (that was 
>> with
>> the student discount)
>>
>> One Ansel is worth about 27 Maplethorpes. (sp) Hell, haven't used 
>> anything
>> other than a Nikon, Leica, or RB since school days but if I wanted to 
>> know
>> the ins and outies of a view cam I'd certainly look to Ansel's writings.
>>
>> Walt
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 


Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Is B.D. all wet again?)
In reply to: Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Is B.D. all wet again?)
Message from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] Is B.D. all wet again?)