Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am photographing as a documentary or journalistic photographer in factory buildings with people working, or workshops, or more generally at workplaces. Also, sometimes at houses of worship. Flash is disturbing, and having a tripod along slows me down too much (I often have very little time) and makes me too noticeable and big deal. I need to be quick, not too obtrusive, and respectful. I always shoot WIDE OPEN (2.8 or 4.5 for the SCW/M). I don't need to hide, since I am given permission to go where I do go. I want to document these sites, and it turns out that what is of interest might well be a poster on the wall (but I only discover this later). Also, I have no idea of what will interest researchers twenty years from now. It is not a matter of framing, so much a matter of preserving as much information as I can. I use wide angle because I need to get as much in as possible, and often I cannot move back. I am also much less obtrusive this way, since I am in the middle yet getting materials which most people think of as out of my frame. And using a tele would make me suspect, an unwelcome intruder. Having said all this, ---Is the G 21 better than the R19new? I have the G21 too. And where does the SWC/M Biogon stand here. All of these will be WIDE OPEN. I know that I can do better stopped down, but that is precluded by the light. --If I changed to a different lens, where should I go? Would the M21 be worth it? Would I be better off with a 50mm Summicron? I realize all the differences in angle of view, rf vs. slr, but what I am asking here is sheer quality of lens at the edges and corners. I really don't care about the center since I know it will be good enough. I hope this is more helpful than my original posting. I appreciate your consideration. Martin My original post: I am interested in detail in the edges and corners, just where most lenses fall off. Perhaps you discover afterwards you are interested in some detail (maybe what is written on the wall) that happens to be in the outer zones of the negative. Right now I use the 19mm Elmarit-R new for most of my work, not at all closeup. Often wide open indoors, no flash. I know that I should be on a tripod, etc. But for my work that is precluded. Can I do better? Maybe a faster lens (albeit less wide), maybe a different system (Leica M, Contax G, Canon, Nikon,...) offers a gem. I also use a Hasselblad SWC/M with the Biogon T*. Its being f/4.5 is sometimes a real problem unless I use film rated at 1600. Also, is there any thoughtful comparison the main normal lenses for the various camera marques. From what I can see, very roughly, the Summicron-M beats them all, but I am no expert. If it is in the archive or someplace, just point me to it. Thank you, Martin Krieger krieger@usc.edu