Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Last film on earth
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Wed Feb 23 11:13:36 2005
References: <BE41F0C1.10558%mark@rabinergroup.com><d9245d24c1d722a3cf90abe886a7ef00@earthlink.net><011b01c519cb$8811f1a0$24a0fea9@MacPhisto> <a3db14cb4c2dcd8dfdd29a456b3b868c@earthlink.net>
 
Main complaint I here from photographers locally is the the new 320 Tri-x
has less contrast, which made die hards change their developing process.

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Feli"
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Last film on earth


> I didn't notice a big difference between the old and new TX, when they
> moved everything to the new factory. Tri-X is pretty much all I shoot.
> I think
> I went through about 200-250 rolls last year, so I am pretty familiar
> with it,
> both as wet prints and scan. What differences do you see, aside from the
> changes in development time? Different tonal range or grain patteren?
>
>
> feli
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Last film on earth)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Last film on earth)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: Last film on earth)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Re: Last film on earth)