Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I didn't notice a big difference between the old and new TX, when they moved everything to the new factory. Tri-X is pretty much all I shoot. I think I went through about 200-250 rolls last year, so I am pretty familiar with it, both as wet prints and scan. What differences do you see, aside from the changes in development time? Different tonal range or grain patteren? feli On Feb 23, 2005, at 9:17 AM, Christopher Williams wrote: > Kodak had the change to Tri-X film after building a new plant a few > years > ago. Basically the film at the new factory did not match the old Tri-X. > Somebody goofed. They got around this by telling users that this a new > and > improved Tri-X. And developing times changed. Some Tri-X 320 users I > know > swear the old stuff was much better. > > I'm sure too most, it looks the same. > > Chris ________________________________________________________ feli2@earthlink.net 2 + 2 = 4 www.elanphotos.com