Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: PAW5
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli)
Date: Fri Feb 18 18:33:43 2005
References: <20050219021040.52314.qmail@web42005.mail.yahoo.com>

It may not be the greatest photograph or even a good one, but if it 
isn't,
it leaves as much to be desired as your poor manners and attitude.

feli

________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4                      
www.elanphotos.com


On Feb 18, 2005, at 6:10 PM, Robert Schwartz wrote:

> At 04:19 PM 2/18/2005, Ted wrote:
>>>
>>> Yuck!  As a photograph, no redeeming qualities.<<<<<<<<
>>
>> Please explain "Yuck! and no redeeming qualities?" As they are 
>> comments
>> not
>> visually descriptive as to the problem with the photograph. So we can
>> "see
>> what you mean and how you'd correct it."
>> thank you,
>> ted
>>
>
>
> Mr. Grant,
>
> You, sir, are a true and great photographer. Your photographs have all 
> of the proper compositional elements and lighting that make for 
> outstanding visual (photographically redeeming) qualities. I have one 
> of your books. Wonderful photographs.
>
> The photograph in PAW5 looks like what I get on the first few frames 
> after the film leader when loading film. Close the back and fire off a 
> few frames. The results are usually crooked (angled), poorly exposed, 
> basically non photographs. PAW5 is crooked, totally improperly exposed 
> (and processed if film), and what might be considered a subject, 
> competes so violently with the railing and background, it's virtually 
> impossible to find. It is a collage of underexposure and lens flare.
>
> I suspect the photograph is indeed a frame from loading film or if it 
> is a digital photograph, then it was an accidental pushing of the 
> shutter release.
>
> But my "fire away" analysis stands. It's a non photograph. It is 
> simply light struck silver halide or pixels. No redeeming photographic 
> qualities.
>
> The PAW5 author stated: "fire away". I simply obliged with my personal 
> opinion. I apologize for not elaborating the first time around.
>
> RWS
>
>
>               
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
>  Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4                      
www.elanphotos.com


Replies: Reply from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] Re: PAW5)
In reply to: Message from robertwschwartz at yahoo.com (Robert Schwartz) ([Leica] Re: PAW5)