Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Introducing a '75 chron at this point in the devolution of Leica and film is about as stupid a move as Leica could possibly make. The company already offers a 75 that is, unquestionably, one of the best lenses in the entire M line - the 75 Summilux. Yes, it is big for an M lens, but it produces absolutely stunning image quality, whether wide open or stopped down. The only thing against it - and I sold mine because of this - is that 75 is a neither/nor focal length; it's too long to be a 50 and not long enough to be a 90 - which is to say, a short tele. Cosina makes an excellent, tiny, 75 2.5 for those who want a pocketable 75 for some reason. For Leica to start screwing around at this point in time with a 75 Summicron shows how out of touch with current reality the company really is. If they want to introduce lenses, they should be introducing a new superwide for the R, to give the people who buy the R digital back - if and when it appears - a good wide despite the digital multiplication factor. IMHO. ;-) -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of John Collier Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 11:08 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] 75 'cron It is going to be about the size of the 50 Summilux which is considerably lighter and smaller than the 90/2AA. John Collier On 5-Feb-05, at 8:34 AM, Frank Filippone wrote: > It is the same size as a 90 ( or really close), no points...... FL is > different, a positive statement. _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information