Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica MP 0.58x - I think I'm being had.....
From: enitka1 at comcast.net (ernie nitka)
Date: Fri Jan 21 09:01:04 2005
References: <OF24D4BDCE.E60FE373-ON85256F90.00542DDB-85256F90.005442C1@manulifeusa.com> <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNOENNBBAB.red735i@earthlink.net>

so you mean I have finally gotten a camera that "might" appreciate in 
value?  I love my .58 MP and now that my lawyer bills are paid off you will 
have to pry it from my cold dead hands.

ernie

At 09:39 AM 1/21/2005, you wrote:
>The .72 did sell well, so why do that one in?
>
>Personally if the MP had a proper rewind knob, I would have been interested.
>But as a archaic technology rewind camera, I was not interested.  A $1500
>uplift ( or whatever they charge) for a proper period 1960's rewind knob is
>not something I am going to spend.
>
>Maybe the MP with a proper rewind knob is the new camera for 2005?  They
>could call it a MPa.
>
>Frank Filippone
>red735i@earthlink.net
>
>
>You may have missed the part of the thread that stated that the two
>off-sizes of rf's did not sell very well.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from bparsons at jhancock.com (bparsons@jhancock.com) ([Leica] Leica MP 0.58x - I think I'm being had.....)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Leica MP 0.58x - I think I'm being had.....)