Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] .58 Mag? - was: 2nd body decisions
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Thu Jan 13 10:56:37 2005
References: <ILENJKCCOJOKJFHFEFACEEOGCGAA.luisripoll@telefonica.net> <41E625F7.5030304@adrenaline.com> <56D96776-6549-11D9-94E9-000D933BB53E@shaw.ca>

Aha!!!  Me'thinks a phone call to this dealer is in order :-)  Maybe there's
a LNIB .58 TTL in my future....

Scott

John Collier wrote:

> There were no 0.58x M6 "classic" bodies. The 0.58x finder was 
> introduced during M6TTL production. It is easy to put a 0.58x finder 
> in if you have a M6TTL to swap finders with.
> On 13-Jan-05, at 12:40 AM, Scott McLoughlin wrote:
>
>> I've been exploring the price and availability of new and used .54 
>> bodies
>> (M6TTL and M7).  I didn't know there was a .54 M6 classic, but I found
>> a dealer (Tamarkin?) that has two unused.  Go figure.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] .54 Mag? - was: 2nd body decisions)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] .54 Mag? - was: 2nd body decisions)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] .58 Mag? - was: 2nd body decisions)