Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks, Bill, for your response. From: "Bill Marshall" <billgem@hotmail.com> > Is it very complex to design a RF camera system that will close focus with > rangefinder coupling to 0.5 or 0.3 meters? I have no idea; I'm not an > engineer or a camera designer. But I know that no other rangefinder camera > does this & that Leica charges $850 for a special macro-adapter to allow > the tele-macro to be focused to 0.5m. If it's "not complex," why doesn't > anyone else do it? It is complex, very complex when, as Frank points out, you factor in the parallax issue that is a very serious one. Why doesn't anyone else do it? My guess is that it's because doing it is a very expensive answer to a question that nobody asked. Leica may be discovering just that with respect to their 90 Macro M lens. If you really want to photograph close-up, why not use your SLR? It is the only way to get a really accurate view of the actual final image and to have some degree of confidence in the accuracy of your focus. > Any basic rangefinder primer advises newcomers that one of the > restrictions of a RF system is that it can't focus much closer than a > meter or so. Well, you are reading inaccurate basic rangefinder primers. As I mentioned, I've been able to focus to 19" with an M4 and a DR since 1967. > For those of us who do like to shoot closer, it is a meaningful > difference. As I said in my original post, it's nice to have the choice. .......and I thoroughly respect that, Bill. I just don't believe that there will be many people buying these outfits in order to use wide-angle lenses at 0.3m Best, Seth LaK 9