Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] BESSA R3A or M7
From: bdcolen at (B. D. Colen)
Date: Thu Jan 6 21:54:08 2005

Just to set the record straight, Feli - I thought that post said it was
NOT quite up to Leica standards....I love my Nocton 50, am please -
shocked - by how solid and well made it is. But it is NOT built like a
Leica lens. Of course, if we're going to be vaguely subjective, we might
say that the Leica M lenses are "overbuilt," if such a thing is
possible. :-)

-----Original Message-----
[] On Behalf Of
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 3:10 PM
To: Leica Users Group; 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: RE: [Leica] BESSA R3A or M7

>And you can buy how many 4/21s for the price of a Leica 21 ASPH? ;-)

Ohhhh, about 6 or 7. ;-)
My point was that the previous mail was saying that Erwin stated that
VC's build quality was above that of Leica, which is not correct and
something he has never said.

>You gets what you pays the saying goes....I'd guess that when

>you pay the Zeiss prices, you're going to get the Zeiss quality - but 
>what do I know... :-)


Feli di Giorgio       
Leica Users Group.
See for more information

Replies: Reply from feli2 at (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] BESSA R3A or M7)
In reply to: Message from feli2 at (feli) ([Leica] BESSA R3A or M7)