Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] BESSA R3A or M7
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli di Giorgio)
Date: Thu Jan 6 21:58:20 2005
References: <00ae01c4f42c$a6902760$6501a8c0@ccapr.com>

On Jan 6, 2005, at 12:16 PM, B. D. Colen wrote:

> Just to set the record straight, Feli - I thought that post said it was
> NOT quite up to Leica standards....I love my Nocton 50, am please -
> shocked - by how solid and well made it is. But it is NOT built like a
> Leica lens. Of course, if we're going to be vaguely subjective, we 
> might
> say that the Leica M lenses are "overbuilt," if such a thing is
> possible. :-)


You are correct, sir. I misread the initial post and was off to the 
races without
even a single a cup of coffee. Serves me right for diving into my 
email, before
my brian was firing on all cylinders.
8-)

feli


_______________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                    2 + 2 = 4                     
www.elanphotos.com






Replies: Reply from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] BESSA R3A or M7)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] BESSA R3A or M7)