Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Rangefinder Basics
From: jefferys at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Sat Jan 1 17:30:39 2005
References: <BAY101-F24C6EF1E3BB41F60C9C1B6CE9F0@phx.gbl> <6.1.0.6.2.20050101170229.05aafe48@192.168.100.42> <76ba89b3050101171448989417@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050101172536.05a9ecf0@192.168.100.42>
 
It isn't $2,000 faster, and that is the difference here. ;-)


On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 17:27:12 -0800, Richard
<richard-lists@imagecraft.com> wrote:
> I hate to nitpick, but half a stop faster (if that) is not MUCH faster :-)
> 
> Great pic!
> 
> At 05:14 PM 1/1/2005, Jeffery Smith wrote:
> 
> >Let me enthusiastically support the notion of not using a flash. And
> >your timing is very good, in that the 40/1.4 that has just come out is
> >fast and cheap and good. If you can go higher than that, the CV 35/1.2
> >is much faster (but much bigger and costs twice as much). Sonny shot
> >this using mine and 400 ISO Kodak T400CN.
> >
> >http://www.sonc.com/jeff_and_kid.htm
> 
> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please
> use richard at imagecraft.com)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from mikezx18 at hotmail.com (mike zx18) ([Leica] Rangefinder Basics)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Rangefinder Basics)
Message from jefferys at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Rangefinder Basics)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Rangefinder Basics)