Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard,
Thanks for the info. I already have a extensive collection of Nikkor
glass. Everything from a 14mm to a 400mm 2.8 AFS. When I want to bring
my D2h along my wife always complains about the weight and bulk. This
is why I am looking into the Leica system. Something I can bring along
that is unobtrusive but still feel like a quality 35mm camera. I want
something hardy as I play hard with the kids. That is why I am not
looking at the d70. I am heading off to Keeble & Schucket hopefully on
Monday to do some comparison shopping. I am trying to be for armed
before I go and play.
Thanks,
Chris
On Jan 1, 2005, at 3:58 PM, Richard wrote:
> Hi Chris, let me say this...
>
> If you do NOT already have some Leica glass and if your goal is
> getting into digital, then you will probably find a Canon 20D or Nikon
> D70, Olympus E-1 etc. will be a lot more satisfying.
>
> I bought an M7 almost 2 years ago and have really fallen in love with
> the RF magic. I have some expensive Leica glass, so to me the R-D1 is
> worth it. If *I* am going to move to digital, why bother to spend
> money on another system when I can use my Leica glass on the digital
> body?
>
> As for quality of the lens, I love mine. However, people who have been
> shooting forever and not equipment bigots say that if you select the
> finest from most manufacturers, most of the time, the limiting factor
> is not the lens, but the (film/sensor, lack of use of tripod, bad
> photographing technique etc.)
>
> My advice is that if you want to get into the Leica magic, start with
> the M7 and build a lens collection around it. If you want to do
> digital, get a Canon 20D. Either will give you superb technical
> images. The rest is up to you :-)
>