Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: First Snow and Christmas: Digilux 2
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Mon Dec 20 17:42:31 2004
References: <p0620074dbdecebcd2b7a@[131.142.12.152]> <20041220233507.1136.qmail@balhpl01.ncable.net.au> <p0620074fbded27aa3339@[131.142.12.152]> <20041221012837.14399.qmail@balhpl01.ncable.net.au>

firkin - I just ran a quick test by shooting a newspaper front page. 
The EVF appears to be exact at least to what such a rough test would 
show.  I'd estimate the possible error of the test would be tens of 
pixels in both directions.  It seems to me that it wouldn't be a cost 
driver to make it exact, though, so I suppose the best guess is that 
it is.

Does anyone have anything more specific on this?

Thanks.

>Richard S. Taylor writes:
>>firkin - I see what you mean about the yellow sign, now that you've 
>>called my attention to it.  With regard to getting the lamp up a 
>>bit, is the idea to get it and the bow out of the trees and to make 
>>it more dominant?
>
>
>
>I would have liked the lamp against the sky, keeping the bow within 
>the trees. If the bow fell into the sky, its contrast with the sky 
>might be too great, but falling on the darker background keeps it 
>"dominant".
>
>>I don't know if the framing is exact or not now that I think about 
>>it.  It has an electronic viewfinder that duplicates what appears 
>>on the back panel LCD but that doesn't mean it covers the same 
>>field as the sensor, any more than most SLR finders necessarily 
>>cover the field seen by the film.  I'll have to check.
>>It's an interesting question.  Until you asked, I just assumed they 
>>were the same.  I'll let you know what I learn.
>
>Thanks. I think framing is even more important with digital cameras, 
>especially with a 4 or 5 MP where you want to have as many pixels at 
>your command in the final print as possible. I've always been happy 
>with my negs to crop almost 50% out of enlargements, so I'm not so 
>fussy with the rangefinder. I do not have enough experience to say 
>this with certainty, but my "research" would suggest I'd need at 
>least 8 to 10 MP to allow such luxury.
>Alastair Firkin @ work ;-)
>http://www.afirkin.com
>http://www.familyofman2.com _______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-- 
Regards,

Dick
Boston MA

Replies: Reply from firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin) ([Leica] Re: First Snow and Christmas: Digilux 2)
In reply to: Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] First Snow and Christmas: Digilux 2)
Message from firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin) ([Leica] Re: First Snow and Christmas: Digilux 2)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] Re: First Snow and Christmas: Digilux 2)
Message from firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin) ([Leica] Re: First Snow and Christmas: Digilux 2)