Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]All photographs are ambiguous to a greater or lesser degree In part, because unlike say painting or moving pictures, photographs lack a complete language - what they have is more like a half or partial language. Partly because photographs are always a quotation that is discontinuous - a 1/60 or 1/250th sec slice of time. We don't usually know what went on either side of that fraction of a second. (sometimes we do if it is a particular event in History - big H - or small h - personal history. e.g. we were part of the rest of the family sat in the booth in "Madison" - then the photograph becomes less ambiguous - but most of the time that continuity is broken and so the meaning is open and ambiguous). The best and most succesful(or perhaps exceptional) photographs are those in which that ambiguity is actually clarified because the photogrpahic quote is extended - not in time i.e. a longer exposure, but extended in meaning. That discontinuity and ambiguity that makes other peoples family albums generally meaningless to us is turned on it's head and in the expressive photograph - one in which there is that extension of meaning - the discontinuity instead of provoking a lack of interest (why should I be interested this photograph of these two grinning children on a beach who I don't know?) instead provokes expectations of further meaning, we begin to look for further revelation and the picture moves us in some way - it's meaning has been extended - and I am interested in (what appear to be) a father and daughter in a restaurant booth - who I know absolutely nothing about. It is in large part the inherent initial ambiguity of photography that allows for that to take place. "Madison's" literal or real meaning is unknown to us (which is nearly always the case when the photograph stands alone -words are required to give us that particular meaning - but the addition of a caption or even a title actually reduces the expressive power of such a photograph). However, the photographs natural inherent ambiguity actually allows us to make connections, instigates ideas and feelings, memories and echoes, and its ambiguity enlightens rather than confuses us. tim a