Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PAW Dec 12,2004
From: cmbrow at wm.edu (Chandos Michael Brown)
Date: Sun Dec 12 10:14:19 2004

I think that it's a tough call, Feli.  The graphical elements are
strong, I suppose, in one and three, but I have a hard time envisioning
a successful print or either of them.  There're a lot of intersecting
gazes in two, which I find intriguing.  On my monitor it appears soft,
but I suspect that this is an artifact of jpg compression.

Cheers,

Chandos


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+cmbrow=wm.edu@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+cmbrow=wm.edu@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Feli
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 12:28 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW Dec 12,2004

Yes, the light was raking and there was a huge difference in contrast.
Sunlight was f16/500th, shadows f16/30th (400asa)

feli

On Dec 12, 2004, at 9:23 AM, Chandos Michael Brown wrote:

> Hi, Feli,
>
> On my monitor these are way, way dark, especially "man with a hat."  
> The
> entire left side of the frame is lost in shadow.  Are they supposed to
> look like this?
>
> Cheers!
>
> Chandos


________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4
www.elanphotos.com

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] PAW Dec 12,2004)