Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Digital Module R sensor vs EOS
From: lowiemanuel at yahoo.ca (Emanuel Lowi)
Date: Thu Dec 9 15:24:03 2004

Scott Gregory wrote:


> Will be interesting to see if you are tempted in a
> few years if Leica brings out a digital M, with fit
> and finish as great as the current film based M7 or
> MP.

I was asking myself the same question earlier today,
after reading Tom A.'s review of his Epson-loaned
RD-1, wherein Tom graciously confessed to some mixed
feelings about the whole digital experience. 

My conclusion was this.

If at some time there is a rangefinder digital camera
body compatible with Leica glass -- or some other
equivalent -- that allows film-quality results (as far
as megapixels etc. go) and also offers the ideal
ergonomics of an M, and if I can drop off my card-full
of digital images at some commercial station and then
later retrieve prints or the future equivalent of
slides -- no fuss, no muss, no &%$#@'ing around with
computers and inkjet printers -- then I'm in like
Flynn.

For me, the M body is the ideal shape and size for my
kind of photography. The results with current Leica
glass and my preferred slide films are as close to
accessible perfection as I can hope for. I like the
ease and quality of custom lab service. 

Those are my longstanding standards. But with today's
digital gear & services, we remain in a galaxy far far
away.

Emanuel Lowi
Montreal

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

Replies: Reply from s_gregory1 at mac.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] Re: Digital Module R sensor vs EOS)