Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2
From: jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Sun Dec 5 18:40:19 2004
References: <200412051050.iB5Am3BV033539@server1.waverley.reid.org> <"002b01c4 dad8$5867df50$a752d553"@mendigain> <056D8A01-46F6-11D9-AD63-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca> <6E5D55FB-46FE-11D9-9B6B-003065B7587A@interlink.es>

Even the Nikkor 28mm f1.4? Try it and then decide...its the ultimate low 
light lens for SLRs
Cheers
Jayanand Govindaraj
Chennai, India

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Luis Miguel Casta?eda" <lmc@interlink.es>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 2:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2


> On 5 de dic de 2004, at 20:44, John Collier wrote:
>
>> Sure, underwater.
>
> underwater is nearly unbeatable, but isnt as bad as you think on land, at 
> least I will prefer it before the other nikkors for F-mount I've tried.
>
> Obviously it cant stand with a modern asph well designed one. I was trying 
> to say that Nikkor-F 28s arent so good.
>
>
> Saludos, lmc@imaginarymagnitude.net
> lmc@interlink.es
> ________________________________________________
> "When Government fears the people, it's liberty.
> When people fear the Government, it's tyranny."
> -- Benjamin Franklin
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2)
Message from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2)