Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: OT Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sun Dec 5 17:47:35 2004

Try the 28 1,4 some time. That is a hell of a lens. No, it's not as good
as the 28 Summicron M ASPH. At least not down to f2. But at 1.4 it?s
about 100 times better than the Summicron ASPH M. ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
F?lix L?pez de Maturana
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 5:02 PM
To: lug@leica-users.org
Subject: [Leica] Re: OT Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2


>I was
>trying to say that Nikkor-F 28s arent so good.

Both the 2.8 and 2 have given me, with a F3, very good output, never up
the 
level of mentioned 28 M Summicron ASPH.

Felix 


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from fmaturana at euskalnet.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] Re: OT Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2)