Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled
From: grduprey at rockwellcollins.com (grduprey@rockwellcollins.com)
Date: Sat Nov 20 07:24:16 2004

BD

How did the $4990 back become a $7000 back?  Also, I would not be wanting 
to swap it back and forth every day anyway.  I would suspect that most 
users will dedicate one R8/9 to digital and another to film.  If they did 
not have 2 R8/9's then they would probably use it for one or the other and 
very seldom switch back and forth several times during a shoot.  As I 
understand it, the problem comes with keeping every thing clean and the 
chance of some clutz of a user damaging the back from changing it 
constantly or in a hurry by not using the protective cover when storing 
it.  Or the hinge wearing out due to excessive changing of the back, 
easily fixed I would think anyway.

Gene


Except that Leica's $7K? digital back is not intended to be swapped on a
regular basis, according to a post here recently. What it really looks
like is they decided to produce half a digital SLR figuring that the
loyalists would be willing to accept that. Nikon's, I would guess, will
be truly swappable - IF they produce one.

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Rick Dykstra
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 7:00 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled


All those gold contacts on the R8 were reputedly for the autofocus. 
Remember how the R system was going to get autofocus, via a moving back 
for the R8?  1998, that was.  As soon as I heard it was off the agenda 
I went out and bought an F5 and a 300, just for sport.  Now Nikon have 
turned copy-cats, with a digi-back F6?  Geez, it'd make sense for it to 
be compatible with the F5 - that's the way Leica would do it.  And one 
of the reasons I'll stick with Leica.


On 18/11/2004, at 10:21 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> On 11/17/04 12:32 PM, "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> typed:
>
>> If anyone wants to place a small wager, I'll bet that within six to 
>> 18 months Nikon will, in fact, introduce a digital back for the F6. 
>> In fact, I'm convinced that's why they're introducing the F6 in the 
>> first place.
>
>
> Well soon someone will have one in hand and check for all kinds of
> funny
> gold contacts.  Although I'm not sure if anyone ever saw them on the 
> R8.
>
>
> Mark Rabiner
> Photography
> Portland Oregon
> http://rabinergroup.com/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)
Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)