Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The Leica CL ! or Bessa R3A ?
From: s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal)
Date: Fri Nov 12 12:54:34 2004
References: <1100269224.4194c6a85aeb3@imp2-q.free.fr><00fe01c4c8d9$36834ed0$7d38030a@D1S9FY41><01e401c4c8f6$009373f0$1529e652@daniel> <41951EF4.D39B43AC@earthlink.net>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Gandy" <leicanikon@earthlink.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] The Leica CL ! or Bessa R3A ?


> Both the CL and CLE are fine cameras
> however they are getting old,  and meter parts for both are practically
> nonexistent.
>
> for about the same money  ($599) you can get the Voigtlander Bessa R3A
with
> AE or metered manual, and a lovely 1:1 finder. It  starts shipping in
> December.  the only thing the 3A  lacks compared to the other two is the
> TTL flash on the CLE
>
> to me anyway, the R3A is a better camera than either the CL or CLE, as
well
> as a better long term choice after you look at the parts situation.
>
> the disclaimer is that I am also selling the R3A, but the reason I started
> selling Voigtlander is that I liked the product line.
>
> Stephen Gandy
>
> That,s a pity i hoped mine would arrive soon.
Thanks for letting us know
simon jessurun
amsterdam
the netherlands
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from daniel.rocha at free.fr (daniel.rocha@free.fr) ([Leica] The Leica CL !?)
Message from sethrosner at direcway.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] The Leica CL !?)
Message from daniel.rocha at free.fr (Daniel ROCHA) ([Leica] The Leica CL !?)
Message from leicanikon at earthlink.net (Stephen Gandy) ([Leica] The Leica CL ! or Bessa R3A ?)