Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Microtek Large Format Scanner
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Fri Nov 12 10:47:01 2004
References: <1d0.2c9704d3.2ec64102@aol.com>

Thanks Sonny.  Some photo!  Wow!  ;-)  But a 
question: was the 9800XL scan done with the 
transparency adapter (i.e., illuminated from 
behind) or as a reflective scan?

>I have the Microtek Scanmaker 9800XL scanner and am extremely pleased  with
>it.  With firewire on a computer with a good amount of memory, it  flies
>through the files.
>
>Here is a comparison of a slide scanned on the  flatbed with the same slide
>on a Nikon Coolscan 5000 (No sharpening  applied)
>
>Pardon the explicit sexual nature of this shot.  ;>D
>
>http://www.sonc.com/scan_compare.htm
>
>The dedicated slide  scanner is sharper, but the Microtek might serve well
>even for production.   It would be sharper even 
>if you were scanning the film on
>the glass.  I use  it to scan 2 1/4 and 4x5 fairly often.
>
>
>Regards, 
>Sonny
>http://www.sonc.com
>Natchitoches, Louisiana
>Oldest continuous  settlement in La Louisiane
>?galit?, libert?, crawfish


-- 
Regards,

Dick
Boston MA


In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] Microtek Large Format Scanner)