Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Frank, Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe several sources state that the 28 ASPH also has a ground aspherical element. It is currently my fave. That first 35 Lux ASPH is pretty rare, isn't it? Do you know how many were made? It might be a plus that the 50 ASPH now has a ground Aspherical surface. Wonder whether it's true. Irwin's initial review stated that the element is pressed. William At 09:37 AM 11/07/2004 +0000, you wrote: >Hi Sander, >I did check whether this new batch of titanium stuff was still a coating >or not. It states explicitly on the Leica website that the limited edition >is made with solid titanium not a coating. >I had not read that the Asph surfaces are no longer pressed. I know the >asph surfaces for the f1.2 Noctilux and original 35mm f1.4 Aspherical >(which is my most used lens BTW) were ground and the scrap was rate high. >I know that the immediately subsequent asph surfaces were hot pressed. I >had heard that there were problems pressing the asph surface for the 90 >AA, but had not heard they had reverted to a ground surface. I had not >heardl that any recent lenses were ground aspherics. The "mass" production >of ground aspherics is certainly feasible now as they are used on the >larger elements in Canon aspheric lenses, but AFAIK grinding is only used >when the element is too big for hot pressing. >I believe that the 35-70 f2.8 was dropped because it proved uneconomic to >make to the desired tolerances, was this a problem with aspheric surfaces? >Frank