Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Here we go, RD-1 in the US
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Fri Oct 22 20:41:03 2004
References: <007501c4b8a5$5c6abc30$6401a8c0@ccapr.com>
 
At 10:09 PM -0400 10/22/04, B. D. Colen wrote:
>To each his own...But do keep in mind that it will be harder to focus
>than a 135 on a Leica M...and it will have the depth of field of a 90...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
>[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>Dan C
>Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 10:03 PM
>To: Leica Users Group
>Subject: RE: [Leica] Here we go, RD-1 in the US
>
>
>Why?   Because I own a 90 (and a 135 FWIW) and I'd like to be able to
>use
>it on future digital rangefinders, even it it becomes a 135/2.
>
>-dan c.

It will have less DOF than a 90, as the magnification for the same 
size print will be larger.

-- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Here we go, RD-1 in the US)