Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]To each his own...But do keep in mind that it will be harder to focus than a 135 on a Leica M...and it will have the depth of field of a 90... -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Dan C Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 10:03 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: RE: [Leica] Here we go, RD-1 in the US Why? Because I own a 90 (and a 135 FWIW) and I'd like to be able to use it on future digital rangefinders, even it it becomes a 135/2. -dan c. At 09:17 PM 22-10-04 -0400, B. D. Colen wrote: >Why not? Or, more to the point - why? It would be a 135 with no finder >magnification, and with a shorter rangefinder base than you have on an >M. > >-----Original Message----- >From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org >[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of >Dan C >Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 8:51 PM >To: Leica Users Group >Subject: RE: [Leica] Here we go, RD-1 in the US > > >Can a 90 be used with the RD-1? > >-dan c. >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information