Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Come on, Doug - My attitude toward R cameras is that they are pigs, but if you like pigs, and God knows you know how to make those particular pigs squeal in a loud and beautiful way, more power to you. And you and I both know - and a trip to the archives will back me up on this - that what matters is whether a particular camera works for you. All I've said about Leica and Rs is that Leica has been way behind the pack in terms of reflex development, and the Rs are and have been money losers for some time. Which happens to be the truth. :-) -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Herr Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:03 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: RE: [Leica] Epson & Hermes & .58 & .85 etc. "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> wrote: > I'd suggest that your attitude - you have no use for it, and therefore > why should anyone else - is clearly Leica's attitude, and it's why > they're in trouble. LOL! B.D., your attitude toward R cameras seems to be the same as the one you decry in others. Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information