Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Greg- Those results make sense. So, Fujichrome 100 (Provia, I assume) produces a better print, either directly or scanned, than a 6 mp DSLR can produce. But still, the DSLR print looks pretty good. Bob > >From a 6 megapixel dSLR... > > ...better than 24X36 from a 35mm colour neg. > ...better than 20X24 from colour neg, too. > > But not as good as a reversal print from Fujichrome 100. > > And not as good as a print of the same size from a good scan of a > Fujichrome slide. > > What can I say? ...it works! Don't know why, but my printer makes great > prints with chemicals or pixels. > > The qualifiers being... > > I have never liked colour neg film ...not even Reala. > Not for printing or scanning. Only used it when there was no other option. > > Digital replaced colour neg in my work but not chrome. > > I have not worked with B&W negs in almost 10 years. > > > Greg Locke > St. John's, Newfoundland > http://blog.greglocke.com > ----------------------------- > Independent journalism from > Newfoundland & Labrador > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: lug-bounces+locke=straylight.ca@leica-users.org >> [mailto:lug-bounces+locke=straylight.ca@leica-users.org] On >> Behalf Of robertmeier@usjet.net >> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 2:51 PM >> To: Leica Users Group >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Genuine Fractals-any good? >> >> >> Greg- >> >> What do those 24x36 prints look like? >> >> Bob >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information