Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I haven't yet handled an RD1, Nathan, but I find the objection to the shutter advance interesting. Because I would think that requiring this pause, if you will, brings the digital shooting experience that much closer to the film RF experience - and that can only be positive, no? Doesn't it force you to think a bit more about each frame, just as shooting film with an M - v. shooting film with a motor driven SLR - forces you to do? Granted, it's "fake" in a way, but it strikes me in theory as one of the rare times when "fake" may be good. B. D. -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Wajsman Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 1:40 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Photokina _ The lens on Tom's RD1 Hi Howard, Lucien already answered the question about the lens. I did try Tom's RD1 and liked it a lot. It felt heavy and substantial, and the viewfinder is excellent. Even if it were a film body, I would consider it the most solidly built of the CV cameras. As a digital body, it must be giving a lot of folks in Solms grey hair. The one thing I did not like is the need to "advance" the shutter with what used to be the film advance lever. I realize that they did it to keep the form factor as close as possible to a film camera, but frankly I could have done without it. To me, this kind of pretending that the camera is something it is not constitutes a pure marketing gimmick without any value. A couple of times I pressed the shutter release and nothing happened because I had forgotten to "advance". Nathan Howard Cummer wrote: > Hi Nathan, > Enjoy your pictures and commentary as always. Can you please tell me > what Leica lens Tom is using on his RD1 in picture 40alt1? Did you try > Tom's RD1? Impressions?? > Thanks > Howard > On Monday, Oct 4, 2004, at 05:27 Asia/Hong_Kong, > lug-request@leica-users.org wrote: > >> Message: 14 >> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 21:32:08 +0200 >> From: Nathan Wajsman <nathan.wajsman@planet.nl> >> Subject: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 40 and more: Photokina 2004 >> To: LEG <leica@freelists.org>, Leica Users Group >> <lug@leica-users.org> >> Message-ID: <416053B8.1090706@planet.nl> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed >> >> This week's PAW could only be one thing: the day I spent at Photokina >> yesterday. Going to Photokina is a fixture of my life in the >> even-numbered years. The excuse is to go and see all the new goodies, >> but in reality the main reason I go is to meet with friends from the >> LUG/LEG and from the Viewfinders photo club in Brussels. So from >> yesterday's excursion, I have selected a few images for the PAW. I >> have also put up a larger (31 images) Photokina gallery at: >> http://www.nathanfoto.com/indexkina.html >> >> And here is Tom, pronouncing on some undoubtedly weighty subject: >> http://www.nathanfoto.com/paw/2004/2004_40alt1.jpg >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information