Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Ikon
From: daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Sun Oct 3 05:55:53 2004
References: <000801c4a8c9$dfed4be0$6401a8c0@ccapr.com>

Why bother with the bodies? It's the lenses that caught my attention. I
hope _they_ get sold at a bargain compared to Leica. I doubt it though.
They're probably better.

Daniel

On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, B. D. Colen wrote:

> One thing to keep in mind about the Zeiss, guys - assuming that it's a
> really well built, solid body: If you can buy a new Zeiss with a good
> warranty for what you can buy a used M6 for, why would you be buying an
> M6 with a slower flash sync, slower top shutter speed, bottom loading,
> and lower viewfinder magnification - other than to buy a red dot.
> And all of that is assuming that the Zeiss is a high quality body. I'd
> suggest that we may not only be at the end of the age of film, but if
> this camera is as good as promised, we may also be at the end of the age
> in which one automatically goes for the Leica M assuming it to be
> superior to everything else.
>
> But who knows, it may turn out that it is still superior. :-)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
> Dan C
> Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 5:43 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Zeiss Ikon
>
>
> Nathan....I also have one of those "rare" non-TTL bodies.  I stopped
> using it and reverted back to my older .72 model, hoping that maybe I
> could make
> a killing on eBay.   But last week one in perfect condition sold for
> only
> $1200; so much for my dream.   But this is what prompted me to start
> this
> thread.
>
> My local dealer here in Montreal told me that he can't get $1500 CDN for
> a used regular M6.  But unless that Zeiss Ikon turns out to be some kind
> of miracle camera (and a bigger viewfinder alone won't do it for me) and
> I wanted a rangefinder, that used M6 is sure tempting.
>
> By the way, I actually prefer the .72 model, and hindsight tells me that
> I was slightly crazy when I bought the .85 model.
>
> -dan c.
>
> At 11:26 PM 02-10-04 +0200, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> >My 0.85 viewfinder on the M6 is the best of them all. That is the only
> >Leica rangefinder body I have kept following my digital epiphany. And
> to
> >make it even better, it is one of the "rare" non-TTL versions of the
> >M6HM. Not that I care, I have already deflowered it from a collector's
> >point of view by using it extensively since buying it a couple of years
> ago.
> >
> >Nathan
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
Reply from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)